AI-ENHANCEDFREE⏱️ 15 min

Accessibility Roadmap Template for PowerPoint

Free accessibility roadmap PowerPoint template. Plan WCAG compliance milestones, assistive technology support, and inclusive design initiatives.

By Tim Adair5 min read• Published 2025-11-19• Last updated 2026-01-31
Accessibility Roadmap Template for PowerPoint preview

Accessibility Roadmap Template for PowerPoint

Free Accessibility Roadmap Template for PowerPoint — open and start using immediately

Enter your email to unlock the download.

Weekly SaaS ideas + PM insights. Unsubscribe anytime.

Quick Answer (TL;DR)

This free PowerPoint accessibility roadmap template helps product teams plan WCAG compliance work, assistive technology support, and inclusive design improvements on a quarterly timeline. Each initiative is tagged by compliance level (A, AA, AAA), effort, and affected user group. Download the .pptx, populate it with your accessibility audit findings, and use it to coordinate remediation work across design, engineering, and QA teams.


What This Template Includes

  • Cover slide. Title slide with product name, target WCAG version, and accessibility lead.
  • Instructions slide. How to categorize issues by WCAG level, assign severity, and track progress against compliance milestones. Remove before sharing externally.
  • Blank accessibility timeline slide. A four-quarter grid with rows for each work stream (audit and testing, design updates, engineering remediation, documentation and training). Each initiative card shows WCAG level, affected disability group, effort estimate, and status.
  • Filled example slide. A realistic accessibility roadmap for a SaaS product showing screen reader compatibility fixes, color contrast overhaul, keyboard navigation improvements, and ARIA landmark implementation, with compliance milestones marked at quarter boundaries.

Why PowerPoint for Accessibility Roadmaps

Accessibility work competes for the same engineering cycles as feature development. Without a visual timeline, it gets pushed to "next sprint" indefinitely. A PowerPoint slide makes the scope visible to leadership. How many issues exist, which ones carry legal risk, and when compliance milestones will be reached. That visibility is what turns accessibility from a backlog afterthought into funded work.

The slide format also helps with cross-functional coordination. Design needs to update color palettes before engineering can implement them. QA needs test plans before they can validate fixes. A timeline with dependency markers keeps all three teams moving in sequence rather than duplicating effort or blocking each other.


Template Structure

Work Stream Rows

Four rows organize accessibility work by function: audit and testing (automated scans, manual testing, user testing with assistive technology), design updates (color contrast, focus indicators, touch targets, layout adjustments), engineering remediation (ARIA attributes, keyboard handling, semantic HTML, screen reader compatibility), and documentation and training (developer guidelines, design system a11y specs, QA test procedures).

Compliance Level Badges

Each initiative card carries a WCAG compliance badge: Level A (minimum, addresses the most critical barriers), Level AA (standard target for most products, required by many legal frameworks), or Level AAA (aspirational, highest standard). This helps teams prioritize. Level A violations should ship before Level AA enhancements.

Milestone Markers

Vertical milestone lines mark compliance targets: "WCAG 2.2 Level A complete by end of Q2" or "Level AA audit-ready by Q4." Milestones create accountability and give leadership clear dates to communicate to legal, sales, and customer-facing teams.


How to Use This Template

1. Run an accessibility audit

Start with an automated scan (axe, Lighthouse, WAVE) to catch obvious violations, then follow up with manual testing using keyboard-only navigation and screen readers. The usability testing process applies here too. Recruit users who rely on assistive technology to test real workflows, not just individual components.

2. Categorize and score findings

Group each finding by WCAG level (A, AA, AAA), affected disability group (visual, motor, cognitive, auditory), and work stream (design, engineering, or both). Estimate effort for each fix. High-severity Level A violations that affect core user flows go first. Use the RICE framework with reach defined as the number of affected users including assistive technology users.

3. Sequence on the timeline

Place audit and design work ahead of engineering remediation. Engineers cannot fix contrast ratios until design delivers updated color tokens. Schedule the highest-severity Level A items in Q1, remaining Level A and critical Level AA items in Q2, and lower-priority Level AA items in Q3-Q4. Set milestone markers at the end of each quarter showing cumulative compliance progress.

4. Review with cross-functional stakeholders

Walk through the roadmap with engineering leads, design, QA, legal, and customer success. Legal needs to know when compliance milestones will be hit. Customer success needs talking points for accessibility-sensitive customers. Engineering needs to validate that effort estimates account for testing time. The stakeholder management guide covers how to run these alignment sessions.


When to Use This Template

An accessibility roadmap becomes essential when:

  • An audit reveals more than a handful of WCAG violations that cannot be fixed in a single sprint
  • Legal or compliance deadlines require documented progress toward accessibility standards
  • Enterprise customers include accessibility requirements in procurement evaluations
  • Multiple teams (design, frontend, QA) need to coordinate on remediation work
  • Your product has accumulated technical debt in the form of inaccessible components that need systematic remediation

If your product has fewer than ten accessibility issues and one engineer can address them in a sprint, skip the roadmap and file tickets. This template adds value when accessibility work is a multi-quarter program involving multiple teams.

Key Takeaways

  • Accessibility roadmaps organize remediation work by work stream (audit, design, engineering, documentation) and WCAG compliance level (A, AA, AAA).
  • Always sequence design updates before engineering fixes. Engineers need updated specs to implement correctly.
  • Set quarterly compliance milestones to create accountability and give leadership clear dates for legal and customer communications.
  • Prioritize Level A violations first, then Level AA, using severity and affected user count to break ties.
  • Measure progress through both automated scans and manual testing with assistive technology users.
  • Compatible with Google Slides, Keynote, and LibreOffice Impress. Upload the .pptx to Google Drive to edit collaboratively in your browser.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which WCAG version should we target?+
Target WCAG 2.2 Level AA as the baseline. It is the most widely referenced standard in legal frameworks and enterprise procurement requirements. Level A alone leaves significant barriers in place. Level AAA is rarely achievable across an entire product but worth pursuing for specific high-traffic flows.
How do we measure accessibility improvement over time?+
Track three metrics: automated scan violation count (trending down each quarter), manual audit pass rate by WCAG criterion, and [customer satisfaction](/metrics/customer-satisfaction-csat) scores from users who rely on assistive technology. Automated scans catch roughly 30-40% of real accessibility issues, so never rely on them alone.
Should accessibility work have its own team or be distributed?+
Distributed ownership with a central coordinator works best for most organizations. Every feature team should fix accessibility issues in their components, guided by a central accessibility specialist who sets standards, runs audits, and maintains the roadmap. A dedicated accessibility team creates a bottleneck and signals that accessibility is someone else's problem.
How do I get leadership buy-in for accessibility investment?+
Frame it in three dimensions: legal risk (ADA lawsuits increased 300% between 2018 and 2024), revenue (enterprise deals lost to accessibility requirements in RFPs), and user base (15-20% of the global population has a disability). Connect each roadmap initiative to one of these outcomes. ---

Related Templates

Explore More Templates

Browse our full library of AI-enhanced product management templates