← Back to Glossary
FrameworksP

Porter's Five Forces

Definition

Porter's Five Forces, introduced by Michael Porter in 1979, analyzes five structural forces that determine the competitive intensity and profitability of an industry: (1) threat of new entrants, (2) bargaining power of suppliers, (3) bargaining power of buyers, (4) threat of substitutes, and (5) rivalry among existing competitors.

The framework answers a specific question: why are some industries consistently more profitable than others? Pharmaceutical companies operated on 20%+ net margins for decades because of strong barriers to entry (patents, regulation), limited buyer power (patients need medication), and few substitutes. Meanwhile, airlines average 2-5% margins because entry barriers are moderate, fuel suppliers have power, and price-comparison sites give buyers enormous influence.

Why It Matters for Product Managers

PMs rarely run a full Five Forces analysis for day-to-day feature decisions -- that would be overkill. But the framework is directly useful in three scenarios: evaluating whether to enter a new market, assessing competitive threats during strategy planning, and explaining to stakeholders why certain markets are structurally harder to win in.

Consider the project management software market. Rivalry is intense (Jira, Asana, Linear, Monday, Notion, ClickUp). Buyer power is high because switching costs are moderate and there are dozens of alternatives. The threat of new entrants is real because development tools are relatively cheap to build. This analysis explains why no single PM tool has captured more than around 15% market share -- and why differentiation matters more than feature parity.

PMs building in high-rivalry, low-barrier markets need to think harder about what creates defensibility. Network effects, data advantages, and deep workflow integration become essential -- these are the competitive moats that Five Forces analysis reveals you need.

How It Works in Practice

  • Map each force -- Score each of the five forces as low, medium, or high for your specific market. Be specific: "Buyer power is high because enterprise customers run formal RFPs with 5+ vendors."
  • Identify the dominant force -- In most industries, one or two forces drive profitability more than the others. In B2B SaaS, it is usually rivalry and buyer power. In regulated industries, it is barriers to entry.
  • Assess your position relative to each force -- Where does your product reduce supplier power? Where do your switching costs increase buyer stickiness? Slack reduced buyer power by becoming so embedded in workflows that switching became painful.
  • Connect to product strategy -- Translate force analysis into product priorities. If substitute threat is high, invest in differentiation. If buyer power is high, invest in retention and switching cost features.
  • Revisit annually -- Industry structure shifts. The rise of AI-assisted coding changed the Five Forces for the developer tools market almost overnight. Threats from new AI-native entrants went from low to high within 18 months.

    • Common Pitfalls

  • Using it for tactical decisions -- Five Forces is a strategic tool. Do not use it to decide which feature to build this sprint. Use RICE or weighted scoring for that.
  • Defining the industry too broadly -- "Software" is not an industry for Five Forces purposes. "Enterprise collaboration software for teams of 50-500" is. The forces change dramatically based on scope.
  • Ignoring complements -- Porter's original model omits complementary products. For platforms, the ecosystem of complements (apps, integrations, plugins) can be the strongest competitive force of all.
  • Static analysis -- The forces are not fixed. Running Five Forces once and treating the results as permanent misses disruptive shifts.

    • Related Concepts

    Blue Ocean Strategy is essentially the opposite approach -- instead of analyzing existing competitive forces, it asks how to create uncontested market space. Competitive moat describes the defensive advantages that Five Forces analysis helps identify. For a broader take on strategic direction, see product strategy.

    Related Terms

    Competitive MoatProduct StrategyBlue Ocean Strategy

    Frequently Asked Questions

    When should a PM use Porter's Five Forces vs a SWOT analysis?+
    Use Five Forces when you need to understand the structural dynamics of a market -- especially before entering a new space or during annual strategy reviews. Use SWOT for product-specific assessment. Five Forces tells you about the industry; SWOT tells you about your position in it.
    Is Porter's Five Forces still relevant for software products?+
    Yes, but with caveats. The framework was designed for industrial-era markets. In software, switching costs can be near-zero, new entrants appear overnight, and winner-take-all dynamics from network effects are more extreme than Porter anticipated. Apply it, but weight the forces differently than a textbook suggests.
    ← PreviousPlatform StrategyNext →Positioning

    Explore More PM Terms

    Browse our complete glossary of 100+ product management terms.

    Full GlossaryExplore Frameworks