Definition
A prioritization method in which potential features or initiatives are scored against multiple criteria (e.g., strategic alignment, revenue impact, customer demand, implementation cost), each weighted by importance. Scores are summed or averaged to produce a ranked list. PMs use weighted scoring to bring structure and transparency to prioritization, especially when many stakeholders have competing opinions.
Why It Matters for Product Managers
Understanding weighted scoring is critical for product managers because it directly influences how teams prioritize work, measure progress, and deliver value to users. PMs use weighted scoring to bring structure and transparency to prioritization, especially when many stakeholders have competing opinions. Without a clear grasp of this concept, PMs risk making decisions based on assumptions rather than evidence, which can lead to wasted engineering effort and missed market opportunities.
How It Works in Practice
Teams typically implement this framework by following a structured process:
The goal is not to follow weighted scoring dogmatically but to use it as a thinking tool that brings structure to decisions that would otherwise rely on gut feel.
Common Pitfalls
Related Concepts
To build a more complete picture, explore these related concepts: RICE Framework, ICE Scoring, and Kano Model. Each connects to this term and together they form a toolkit that product managers draw on daily.