What This Template Is For
A retrospective is where your sprint turns into learning. Without a structured format, retros drift into venting sessions or awkward silences. This template gives you a repeatable structure for running effective retros that produce real action items -- not just sticky notes that get forgotten.
It covers the classic What Went Well / What Didn't / Action Items format, plus three alternative formats you can rotate to keep retros fresh across your Scrum team.
When to Use This Template
Step-by-Step Instructions
Step 1: Set the Stage (2 minutes)
State the retro's purpose and ground rules:
Step 2: Gather Data (10 minutes)
Each team member writes observations silently. Use the format below or one of the variations. Aim for 2-3 items per person per column. Silent writing prevents groupthink.
Step 3: Group and Discuss (15 minutes)
Read items aloud, group duplicates, and dot-vote on the top 3 topics. Discuss each selected topic for 3-5 minutes. Ask: "What specifically caused this?" and "What would we change?"
Step 4: Define Action Items (10 minutes)
Every retro must produce 1-3 concrete action items. Each action needs an owner and a due date. Add them to your backlog or team tracker -- not a doc that nobody reopens.
Step 5: Close (3 minutes)
Quick round-robin: one word describing how each person feels about the sprint ahead. Thank the team.
The Retrospective Template
Default Format: What Went Well / What Didn't / Action Items
Sprint: [Sprint number]
Date: [Date]
Facilitator: [Name]
Attendees: [Names]
| What Went Well | What Didn't Go Well | Action Items |
|---|---|---|
| [Item] | [Item] | [Action] -- Owner: [Name], Due: [Date] |
| [Item] | [Item] | [Action] -- Owner: [Name], Due: [Date] |
| [Item] | [Item] | [Action] -- Owner: [Name], Due: [Date] |
Variation 1: Start-Stop-Continue
| Start Doing | Stop Doing | Continue Doing |
|---|---|---|
| [New practice to adopt] | [Practice to drop] | [Practice that's working] |
Variation 2: 4Ls (Liked, Learned, Lacked, Longed For)
| Liked | Learned | Lacked | Longed For |
|---|---|---|---|
| [What you enjoyed] | [New insight] | [What was missing] | [What you wish you had] |
Variation 3: Mad-Sad-Glad
| Mad | Sad | Glad |
|---|---|---|
| [Frustrations] | [Disappointments] | [Wins and positives] |
Example
Sprint: Sprint 14
Facilitator: Sarah
Attendees: Sarah, Marcus, Li, Jordan
| What Went Well | What Didn't Go Well | Action Items |
|---|---|---|
| Shipped search feature 2 days early | QA found 4 bugs in staging that should have been caught in code review | Add a code review checklist to PR template -- Owner: Marcus, Due: Feb 20 |
| Pair programming on the API layer saved rework | Sprint goal changed mid-sprint after stakeholder request | PM to push back on mid-sprint scope changes -- bring to next sprint planning -- Owner: Sarah, Due: Feb 24 |
| Velocity was consistent with last 3 sprints | Stand-ups ran over 15 min on 3 days | Enforce 1-minute-per-person limit, save deep dives for after -- Owner: Jordan, Due: ongoing |