Skip to main content
New: Deck Doctor. Upload your deck, get CPO-level feedback. 7-day free trial.
TemplateFREE⏱️ 15 minutes

Accessibility Compliance Template

Track WCAG 2.2 and ADA compliance with a structured checklist covering all four WCAG principles. Pass/fail status, owners, and evidence notes.

Last updated 2026-03-04
Accessibility Compliance Template preview

Accessibility Compliance Template

Free Accessibility Compliance Template — open and start using immediately

or use email

Instant access. No spam.

Get Template Pro — all templates, no gates, premium files

888+ templates without email gates, plus 30 premium Excel spreadsheets with formulas and professional slide decks. One payment, lifetime access.

Need a custom version?

Forge AI generates PM documents customized to your product, team, and goals. Get a draft in seconds, then refine with AI chat.

Generate with Forge AI

What This Template Is For

Accessibility is not a nice-to-have. Products that fail WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards face legal risk under the ADA, EAA (European Accessibility Act), and equivalent legislation in over 30 countries. Beyond legal exposure, inaccessible products exclude roughly 16% of the global population who live with disabilities.

This template gives product teams a structured way to track WCAG 2.2 compliance across four principles: perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust. Each criterion maps to a specific WCAG success criterion with a pass/fail/partial status, an owner, and evidence notes. Use it alongside the GDPR compliance template if your product also handles personal data from users who rely on assistive technologies. For teams building technical products, the Technical PM Handbook covers infrastructure-level accessibility considerations.

If you are assessing the broader regulatory exposure of your product, the regulatory impact assessment template helps you map all applicable regulations. For tracking accessibility as a product metric, the product metrics library includes engagement metrics that can be segmented by assistive technology usage. The privacy impact assessment template is a useful companion when accessibility and data privacy intersect, such as in screen reader data collection.


When to Use This Template

  • Before launching a new product or major feature to verify baseline accessibility
  • During quarterly accessibility audits as part of your compliance cadence
  • After receiving user complaints or legal notices about accessibility barriers
  • When expanding into the EU market (EAA enforcement begins June 2025)
  • During vendor evaluations to assess third-party component accessibility
  • When onboarding a new design system or UI framework

How to Use This Template

Step 1: Assign an accessibility lead

Designate one person (PM, design lead, or QA engineer) to own the audit. They coordinate testing across the team but do not need to execute every check personally.

Step 2: Scope the audit

Decide which product areas to cover. For a first audit, start with the top 5 user flows by traffic volume. Subsequent audits can expand to less-trafficked pages.

Step 3: Test with real assistive technologies

Automated tools (axe, Lighthouse) catch about 30% of accessibility issues. The remaining 70% require manual testing with screen readers (NVDA, VoiceOver), keyboard navigation, and high-contrast mode.

Step 4: Document findings per criterion

For each WCAG success criterion, record the status (Pass, Fail, Partial, N/A), the owner responsible for remediation, and evidence (screenshot, test result, or PR link).

Step 5: Prioritize and remediate

Rank failures by severity (critical path vs. edge case) and user impact. Fix critical-path failures before the next release. Track remediation in your sprint backlog.


The Template

Perceivable (WCAG Principle 1)

CriterionWCAG RefStatusOwnerEvidence / Notes
All images have meaningful alt text1.1.1
Decorative images have empty alt=""1.1.1
Video content has captions1.2.2
Audio content has transcripts1.2.1
Color is not the sole means of conveying information1.4.1
Text contrast ratio >= 4.5:1 (normal) / 3:1 (large)1.4.3
Non-text contrast ratio >= 3:1 for UI components1.4.11
Content reflows at 400% zoom without horizontal scrolling1.4.10
Text spacing adjustments do not break layout1.4.12

Operable (WCAG Principle 2)

CriterionWCAG RefStatusOwnerEvidence / Notes
All functionality available via keyboard2.1.1
No keyboard traps2.1.2
Focus order follows logical reading sequence2.4.3
Focus indicator visible on all interactive elements2.4.7
Skip navigation link present2.4.1
Page titles are descriptive and unique2.4.2
Link purpose clear from link text (no "click here")2.4.4
Touch targets >= 24x24 CSS pixels2.5.8
No content flashes more than 3 times per second2.3.1

Understandable (WCAG Principle 3)

CriterionWCAG RefStatusOwnerEvidence / Notes
Page language declared in HTML lang attribute3.1.1
Form inputs have visible labels3.3.2
Error messages identify the field and describe the error3.3.1
Error suggestions offered when input format is known3.3.3
Consistent navigation across pages3.2.3
Consistent identification of repeated components3.2.4

Robust (WCAG Principle 4)

CriterionWCAG RefStatusOwnerEvidence / Notes
Valid HTML with no duplicate IDs4.1.1
ARIA roles, states, and properties used correctly4.1.2
Status messages announced to screen readers without focus4.1.3
Custom components expose name, role, value to assistive tech4.1.2

Audit Summary

  • All critical-path flows tested with keyboard navigation
  • All critical-path flows tested with screen reader (NVDA or VoiceOver)
  • Automated scan completed (axe or Lighthouse)
  • Remediation items logged in sprint backlog with owners and deadlines
  • Next audit date scheduled (quarterly recommended)

Filled Example: SaaS Analytics Dashboard

Perceivable (WCAG Principle 1)

CriterionWCAG RefStatusOwnerEvidence / Notes
All images have meaningful alt text1.1.1PassSarah K.Verified in axe scan 2026-02-15. Charts use aria-label describing the data trend.
Decorative images have empty alt=""1.1.1PassSarah K.Background patterns use role="presentation"
Video content has captions1.2.2N/A-No video content in product
Audio content has transcripts1.2.1N/A-No audio content in product
Color is not the sole means of conveying information1.4.1FailJames R.Status badges use color only (red/green). Need icons or text labels. Target: Sprint 14
Text contrast ratio >= 4.5:11.4.3PartialSarah K.Main content passes. Placeholder text in filters is 3.2:1. Fix in PR #892
Non-text contrast ratio >= 3:11.4.11PassSarah K.Chart lines and form borders verified
Content reflows at 400% zoom1.4.10FailJames R.Data table overflows horizontally at 200%+ zoom. Need responsive table component. Target: Sprint 15
Text spacing adjustments do not break layout1.4.12PassSarah K.Tested with bookmarklet. No clipping or overlap.

Operable (WCAG Principle 2)

CriterionWCAG RefStatusOwnerEvidence / Notes
All functionality available via keyboard2.1.1FailJames R.Date picker and chart tooltips require mouse. Target: Sprint 14
No keyboard traps2.1.2PassJames R.Modal dialogs support Escape key
Focus order follows logical reading sequence2.4.3PartialSarah K.Main nav OK. Dashboard widget order skips the filter bar. Fix in PR #894
Focus indicator visible2.4.7PassSarah K.Custom cyan focus ring on all interactive elements
Skip navigation link present2.4.1PassSarah K."Skip to main content" link on every page
Page titles descriptive and unique2.4.2PassSarah K.Format: "Page NameProductName"
Link purpose clear from link text2.4.4PartialSarah K.3 instances of "Learn more" without context. Adding aria-label.
Touch targets >= 24x24 CSS pixels2.5.8PassJames R.Minimum 32x32px on all buttons and links
No content flashes > 3 per second2.3.1Pass-No animated or flashing content

Audit Summary

  • All critical-path flows tested with keyboard navigation
  • All critical-path flows tested with VoiceOver (macOS)
  • Automated axe scan completed (12 issues found, 8 resolved)
  • 4 remediation items logged in Sprint 14-15 backlog
  • Next audit date: 2026-06-01

Key Takeaways

  1. Automated tools catch only 30% of accessibility issues. Manual testing with assistive technologies is required for real compliance.
  2. Start with the top 5 user flows by traffic. A perfect audit of everything is less useful than thorough coverage of what users actually do.
  3. Color-only indicators are the most common failure. Always pair color with icons, text, or patterns.
  4. Keyboard navigation and focus management are the foundation. If a user cannot tab through your product, nothing else matters.
  5. Accessibility is ongoing. Schedule quarterly audits and integrate checks into your CI/CD pipeline.
  6. Document evidence for every criterion. When regulators or legal teams ask, "show me the test result" is a better answer than "we think it works."

Frequently Asked Questions

What WCAG conformance level should we target?+
WCAG 2.2 Level AA is the standard expected by most regulations including the ADA, EAA, and Section 508. Level A is too minimal for real-world compliance. Level AAA is aspirational and not required by any major regulation.
How often should we run an accessibility audit?+
Quarterly is the recommended cadence for most products. Additionally, run targeted audits whenever you ship a new feature that introduces new UI patterns, forms, or interactive components.
Can we rely on automated testing tools alone?+
No. Automated scanners like axe, Lighthouse, and WAVE catch approximately 30% of WCAG issues. They are good at detecting missing alt text, contrast failures, and invalid ARIA. They cannot evaluate keyboard flow, screen reader experience, or whether alt text is actually meaningful.
Who is responsible for accessibility on a product team?+
The PM owns the compliance requirement and audit cadence. Designers own color contrast, focus indicators, and interaction patterns. Engineers own semantic HTML, ARIA implementation, and keyboard handling. QA owns testing with assistive technologies.
What is the legal risk of non-compliance?+
Under the ADA, companies face lawsuits and settlements averaging $10,000-$100,000 per case. The EAA (effective June 2025) enables EU member states to impose fines. Beyond direct penalties, accessibility lawsuits in the US increased 300% between 2018 and 2024.

Explore More Templates

Browse our full library of PM templates, or generate a custom version with AI.

Free PDF

Like This Template?

Subscribe to get new templates, frameworks, and PM strategies delivered to your inbox.

or use email

Join 10,000+ product leaders. Instant PDF download.

Want full SaaS idea playbooks with market research?

Explore Ideas Pro →